An Analysis of Veterans Affairs Reform in the 119th Congress

Feb 10, 2026
The first session of the 119th Congress was defined by a profound tension between radical fiscal restructuring and the preservation of essential commitments to the nation's veterans. Operating within a political landscape marked by the 43-day government shutdown—the longest in United States history—and the high-stakes passage of the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA), the legislature navigated a turbulent environment to enact three pivotal pieces of veterans’ legislation: Public Law 119-70, Public Law 119-71, and Public Law 119-72.1 These laws, stemming from House Bills 224, 1823, and 4446, respectively, represent a strategic effort to resolve long-standing administrative paradoxes in housing eligibility, demand rigorous forensic accounting of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) fiscal management, and modernize vocational rehabilitation for the contemporary labor market.2 This report provides an exhaustive analysis of these legislative developments, examining the motivations, fiscal impacts, and long-term institutional implications of these reforms within the broader context of a transformative and often volatile congressional session.

The Political and Fiscal Ecosystem of the 119th Congress

To understand the passage of Public Laws 119-70, 119-71, and 119-72, one must first analyze the institutional climate of the 119th Congress. Following the reelection of Donald Trump and the Republican takeover of both chambers, the legislative agenda was dominated by aggressive use of the budget reconciliation process.1 The session adjourned on January 3, 2026, after a period characterized by internal challenges to leadership and a dramatic standoff over Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidy extensions that paralyzed the federal government for over a month.1 During this shutdown, the vulnerability of the social safety net became a central theme of national debate, particularly as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits were suspended and federal agencies curtailed operations.1

The defining legislative achievement of the session, the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" (OBBBA), signed into law on July 4, 2025, implemented significant cuts to programs like Medicaid and SNAP while making permanent the 2017 tax rates and increasing defense and border funding.1 The OBBBA also raised the debt limit by $4 trillion to avoid a catastrophic default.5 Within this framework of aggressive fiscal consolidation, the three veterans’ bills emerged as a rare point of bipartisan consensus. While the broader Republican agenda sought to reduce federal expenditures, these targeted reforms for veterans were framed as a matter of "effective government" and "institutional accountability" rather than mere spending.6 The legislative history of these bills reveals a consistent pattern of using the "suspension of the rules" procedure in the House and "unanimous consent" in the Senate, signaling that despite the hyper-partisan environment, the moral obligation to veterans remained a resilient legislative priority.8

Major Legislative Action	Date	Institutional Significance
OBBBA Signed (H.R. 1)	July 4, 2025	Major budget reconciliation; tax cuts; Medicaid/SNAP reforms.1
43-Day Government Shutdown	2025	Longest in U.S. history; triggered by ACA subsidy standoff.1
Senate "Nuclear Option"	Sept 11, 2025	Threshold lowered to simple majority for sub-Cabinet nominees.1
Passage of Veterans Package	Jan 20, 2026	Enactment of P.L. 119-70, 119-71, and 119-72.4

Public Law 119-70: The Disabled Veterans Housing Support Act

Public Law 119-70, originally introduced as H.R. 224 by Representative Monica De La Cruz, addresses a systemic failure in the intersection of veteran benefits and federal housing policy.12 For decades, service-connected disability compensation—intended to indemnify veterans for injuries sustained in the line of duty—was counted as income when determining eligibility for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs.6 This practice often forced disabled veterans into a "benefits cliff," where a modest increase in their disability rating could result in their total disqualification from low-income housing assistance, particularly through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program.6

Legislative Motivation and Mechanistic Reforms

The primary motivation behind P.L. 119-70 was the recognition that disability compensation is not "disposable income" but rather a restorative payment for lost physical or mental faculty.6 By amending Section 102(a)(20) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, the law mandates that states, local governments, and Indian tribes exclude any service-connected disability compensation when determining whether an individual qualifies as having low or moderate income.2 This reform is designed to harmonize the definition of income across the CDBG program, ensuring that veterans are not penalized for the very support they receive for their service-related injuries.12

The importance of this bill is underscored by its potential to stabilize housing for thousands of veterans in high-cost urban areas where CDBG funds are vital for neighborhood revitalization and community services.12 During the floor debate, proponents argued that the reform was a step toward a "better and more effective government," aligning federal policy with the ethical imperative to care for disabled veterans.6 The legislation also reflects a strategic response to the broader welfare reforms of the 119th Congress; as other safety nets were tightened under the OBBBA, protecting veteran access to housing became a critical legislative firewall.1

Affected Populations and Socioeconomic Implications

The primary beneficiaries of P.L. 119-70 are veterans with service-connected disabilities who are currently seeking or receiving assistance under the CDBG program.12 By removing disability pay from the income equation, the law effectively expands the eligibility pool, allowing more veterans to access resources for home repairs, rental assistance, and community development projects. Furthermore, the law affects state and local governments and Indian tribes, which must now adjust their income verification protocols to accommodate this exclusion.2

A significant long-term provision of P.L. 119-70 is the requirement for the Comptroller General of the United States to conduct a comprehensive study.2 Within one year of enactment, the GAO must report on how service-connected disability compensation is treated across all HUD-administered programs.2 This report is intended to identify remaining inconsistencies and provide legislative recommendations to better serve veteran populations and underserved communities.14 This suggests that P.L. 119-70 is the precursor to a more expansive standardization of veteran income exclusions across the entire federal housing landscape.

Financial Impact and Cost Projections

From a fiscal perspective, the CBO estimated that the reporting requirements of H.R. 224 would cost less than $500,000, subject to the availability of appropriated funds.12 Because the total amount of CDBG funding is determined by annual appropriations, the bill does not necessarily increase the total federal deficit; rather, it reallocates who is eligible to compete for those funds at the local level.12 The redistribution of these funds toward disabled veterans may, however, reduce the availability of CDBG resources for other low-income demographics, creating a secondary competition for limited housing aid.6

Key Feature of P.L. 119-70	Description	Affected Parties
Income Exclusion	Disregards VA disability pay for CDBG eligibility.2	Disabled Veterans; HUD.12
Statutory Amendment	Amends 42 U.S.C. 5302(a)(20).2	State/Local/Tribal Govs.14
GAO Mandate	One-year study of HUD-wide veteran treatment.2	GAO; HUD; Congress.12
Status	Signed into law Jan 20, 2026.15	National Housing Agencies.9

Public Law 119-71: The VA Budget Shortfall Accountability Act

Public Law 119-71, the "VA Budget Shortfall Accountability Act," represents an aggressive institutional response to a series of high-stakes financial miscalculations within the Department of Veterans Affairs.7 In 2024 and 2025, the VA leadership presented Congress with catastrophic projections of funding deficits, prompting emergency legislative intervention. Subsequent disclosures revealed that these projections were significantly inaccurate, leading to a breakdown in trust between the agency and the committees of jurisdiction.7

The 2024-2025 Fiscal Crisis and Legislative Response

The motivation for P.L. 119-71 is rooted in the events of July 2024, when the VA claimed a $2.9 billion shortfall in the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) for fiscal year 2024 and projected a $12 billion medical care shortfall for the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) for fiscal year 2025.7 Fearing a delay in benefits for 7 million veterans, Congress passed P.L. 118-82 to provide supplemental funding.7 However, by October 2024, the VA revised these numbers, admitting that the VBA would have actually carried a surplus of over $2.1 billion without the supplemental funds and that the VHA shortfall was overestimated by several billion dollars.7

The importance of P.L. 119-71 lies in its mandate for a forensic audit of the VA’s accounting systems.7 Proponents, led by Representative Jack Bergman, argued that these "budgeting mistakes" resulted in the mismanagement of billions of taxpayer dollars and that the VA must be held accountable for its stewardship of federal funds.7 During the House debate, members expressed "hesitant support," with Ranking Member Takano emphasizing that while accountability is necessary, it must not be used as a pretext for cutting veteran care in the future.16

Mechanistic Provisions for Oversight

The law directs the Comptroller General to conduct a multi-year review of the VA’s financial practices.3 The first review, due shortly after enactment, must examine the circumstances surrounding the 2024 and 2025 shortfalls, comparing monthly obligations against the VA’s official spending plans.3 Furthermore, the GAO is required to conduct annual reviews for five consecutive years (through 2031) to identify significant diversions from spending plans and analyze the accuracy of the VA’s internal projections.7

The affected parties include the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, who must submit the GAO’s findings to Congress, and the various administrations within the VA (VBA and VHA) that will be subject to this heightened scrutiny.3 The goal of the act is to improve the accuracy of the budget information submitted to Congress under 31 U.S.C. 1105(a), thereby preventing future "false claims" of funding shortfalls.7

Financial and Long-Term Institutional Impact

The CBO estimated the cost of the reporting requirements for H.R. 1823 to be less than $500,000 over the 2025–2029 period.7 However, the broader financial impact is the potential prevention of billions of dollars in unnecessary supplemental appropriations. By forcing the VA to provide accurate projections, the law aims to ensure that taxpayer funds are allocated based on reality rather than administrative error.

The potential unintended consequence of P.L. 119-71 is an increase in administrative caution within the VA. If agency officials fear forensic audits, they may become overly conservative in their projections, potentially leading to actual, unaddressed shortfalls if they fail to request sufficient funds for fear of "overestimating." The long-term success of the bill depends on whether the VA can reform its internal accounting procedures to match the rigor demanded by the GAO reviews.7

Forensic Audit Element (P.L. 119-71)	Description	Target
Initial Review	Analysis of 2024/2025 shortfall causes.3	VBA and VHA.7
Spending Plan Comparison	Monthly obligation vs. expenditure audit.3	VA Internal Accounting.19
Remedial Action Report	Recommendations for accurate budgeting.19	Secretary of VA.18
Five-Year Cycle	Annual GAO audits through calendar year 2031.18	Long-term VA Fiscal Policy.7

Public Law 119-72: The FAST VETS Act

Public Law 119-72, the "Focused Assistance and Skills Training for Veterans’ Employment and Transition Success Act" (FAST VETS Act), addresses the efficiency and outcomes of the Veteran Readiness and Employment (VR&E) program.21 As the 119th Congress sought to maximize labor force participation as part of its broader economic agenda, the VR&E program—which provides job training to veterans with service-connected disabilities—came under scrutiny for its flexibility and potential for programmatic "lingering".23

Motivation for Reforming Vocational Rehabilitation

Under the previous statutory framework of 38 U.S.C. 3107, veterans could request changes to their vocational goals with relatively high frequency, often based on changing interests rather than changes in their physical or mental condition.23 The Committee on Veterans' Affairs noted that this was "costly to the program" and led to significant delays in processing other veterans.23 The FAST VETS Act was motivated by a desire to prioritize "outcome-focused planning" and to move veterans into the workforce more efficiently.23

The bill established strict conditions under which a veteran’s individualized vocational rehabilitation plan must be redeveloped.21 Redevelopment is now mandated only if the Secretary determines that:

1. The achievement of long-range goals is no longer feasible due to changes in the veteran's "employment handicap" (disability).22
2. The vocational goal is more likely to be achieved under a different plan.23

By shifting the focus from veteran "interest" to objective "handicap" and "feasibility," the law aims to reduce the time veterans spend in the VR&E program, thereby freeing up resources for those with the most urgent needs.23

Impact on Veterans and VR&E Counselors

The individuals most affected by P.L. 119-72 are the veterans enrolled in VR&E and the counselors who manage their cases. For veterans, the law provides a more clearly outlined process for changing their plans, which the committee believes will reduce frustration and improve consistency in decision-making across regional offices.23 However, it also reduces the flexibility for veterans to explore different career paths if their interests change but their disability rating remains the same.23

For VR&E counselors, the law provides a stronger statutory basis for denying redevelopment requests that are seen as purely "interest-based," allowing them to focus on the "core purpose" of the program: meaningful employment.23 This is intended to address the problem of veterans using the program for multiple unrelated educational tracks, such as completing law school and then attempting to use VR&E for small business training.23

Fiscal Assessment and Program Efficiency

The CBO projected that the FAST VETS Act would have a minor impact on direct spending, estimating a change of less than $500,000 over the 2025–2035 period.23 Because VR&E benefits are paid from mandatory appropriations, the goal of the law is not necessarily to cut the total budget but to improve the "velocity" of veterans through the system.23

A potential unintended consequence is that veterans might be forced to complete training for jobs they no longer want, which could lead to poor employment outcomes or a later need for retraining through other, more expensive federal programs.23 The committee expects that the change will improve outcomes by reducing wait times and ensuring that counselors can prioritize those who are struggling to complete their original plans.23

VR&E Reform Parameter (P.L. 119-72)	Previous Standard	New Statutory Requirement
Redevelopment Criteria	Broadly interpreted; often interest-based.23	Limited to change in handicap or infeasibility.22
Review Period	Annual review by the Secretary.21	Annual review; redevelopment only under specific conditions.22
Program Goal	Vocational education and training.24	Outcome-focused workforce entry.23
Counselor Role	Subjective regional decision-making.23	Standardized application of feasibility criteria.23

Comparative Analysis of Legislative Impacts and Unintended Consequences

The collective enactment of Public Laws 119-70, 119-71, and 119-72 demonstrates a multifaceted approach to veterans' affairs that balances expanded access to housing with intensified fiscal and programmatic discipline. However, these laws do not exist in a vacuum; they interact with the broader reforms of the 119th Congress in ways that may have complex ripple effects.

The Interplay with the OBBBA and Welfare Reform

The passage of the OBBBA in July 2025 created a massive shift in the federal social safety net. With Medicaid losing 10-15 million people and SNAP facing significant state cost-share requirements, the veteran population was increasingly shielded from these cuts through targeted laws.1 P.L. 119-70, in particular, can be seen as a defensive measure to ensure that even as broader low-income standards were being challenged, disabled veterans maintained their specific eligibility for housing aid.12

However, the "Accountability" and "FAST VETS" acts (P.L. 119-71 and P.L. 119-72) align more closely with the OBBBA’s theme of fiscal austerity and efficiency.7 By auditing VA "shortfalls" and limiting the redevelopment of vocational plans, the legislature is signaling that while veterans' programs are protected, they are not exempt from the drive to minimize "waste" and "mismanagement".7

Risk of Administrative Paralysis

One significant risk of these reforms is the potential for administrative paralysis at the VA. The five-year cycle of forensic audits mandated by P.L. 119-71, combined with the more rigid plan redevelopment rules of P.L. 119-72, may create a culture where VA employees are more concerned with statutory compliance than with the individualized needs of the veterans they serve.7 If VR&E counselors become too afraid to redevelop plans for fear of being audited, veterans with complex or evolving disabilities may find themselves trapped in ineffective rehabilitation tracks.

The Evolving Definition of "Income"

The move in P.L. 119-70 to exclude disability pay from CDBG income calculations may set a powerful precedent for other federal programs.2 If the mandated GAO report identifies that this exclusion should be applied HUD-wide, it could fundamentally alter the demographic makeup of federal housing projects.2 While this clearly benefits disabled veterans, it may also lead to a "re-stacking" of priority lists at the local level, potentially displacing other vulnerable populations who do not have the same legislative protections.6

Cost and Financial Impact Summary

The financial implications of these bills are primarily focused on long-term cost avoidance and reporting transparency rather than massive new expenditures. The 119th Congress operated under a "high bar" for new funding, making these low-cost, high-impact reforms particularly attractive to the House and Senate leadership.5

Law	Estimated CBO Cost (Reporting/Audit)	Direct Spending Impact	Primary Financial Stakeholders
P.L. 119-70	< $500k over 10 years.12	Minor (Reallocation of CDBG).12	HUD; Local Govs; Disabled Veterans.12
P.L. 119-71	< $500k (2025-2029).20	Potential billions in cost avoidance.7	VA; Taxpayers; Congress.7
P.L. 119-72	< $500k over 10 years.23	Negligible (Efficiency-focused).23	VR&E; Veterans; Department of Labor.23

Conclusion: A New Era of Veteran Policy

The enactment of Public Laws 119-70, 119-71, and 119-72 marks a significant evolution in the relationship between the federal government and the veteran community. These laws reflect a maturing understanding of the veteran experience, recognizing that providing benefits is only the first step; the second step is ensuring that those benefits are not undermined by administrative barriers or fiscal mismanagement.2

Public Law 119-70 acknowledges the unique nature of disability compensation, removing it from the calculus of poverty to ensure that veterans can access housing.12 Public Law 119-71 demands a level of financial integrity from the VA that has been sorely lacking, using the GAO as a forensic tool to protect taxpayer interests.7 Public Law 119-72 refines the path to employment, demanding that vocational rehabilitation be a journey toward a career rather than an indefinite educational benefit.23

As these laws move into the implementation phase, the success of these reforms will depend on the continued vigilance of the 119th and 120th Congresses. The five-year audit cycle of the VA and the one-year study of HUD programs will provide a wealth of data that will undoubtedly shape the next generation of veteran policy.2 In a session of Congress defined by the longest shutdown in history and radical fiscal restructuring, the bipartisan passage of these laws serves as a reminder that the national commitment to "care for him who shall have borne the battle" remains a central pillar of American legislative identity.1 The long-term effects of these bills will likely be felt in the increased stability of veteran households, the improved accuracy of federal budget projections, and the more efficient transition of disabled veterans into a competitive national workforce.

Works cited

1. ABA Advocacy: The First Session of the 119th Congress - American Bar Association, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.americanbar.org/advocacy/governmental_legislative_work/publications/washingtonletter/january-26-wl/first-session-119th-congress-recap-0126wl/
2. Public Law 119–70 119th Congress An Act, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/119/plaws/publ70/PLAW-119publ70.pdf
3. Public Law 119–71 119th Congress An Act, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/119/plaws/publ71/PLAW-119publ71.pdf
4. US Legislation | 2025-2026 | 119th Congress | Passed - LegiScan, accessed February 8, 2026, https://legiscan.com/US/legislation?status=passed
5. Office of Legislative Affairs - "The Friday Wrap-Up" - GovDelivery, accessed February 8, 2026, https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/CAORANGE/bulletins/3e1e78e
6. DISABLED VETERANS HOUSING SUPPORT ACT; Congressional Record Vol. 171, No. 27 - Congress.gov, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-171/issue-27/house-section/article/H593-5
7. H. Rept. 119-101 - VA BUDGET SHORTFALL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT | Congress.gov, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/committee-report/119th-congress/house-report/101/1
8. Actions - H.R.224 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): Disabled Veterans Housing Support Act, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/224/all-actions
9. All Info - H.R.224 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): Disabled Veterans Housing Support Act, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/224/all-info
10. Actions - H.R.4446 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): FAST VETS Act, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4446/all-actions?overview=closed
11. Congressional Bill H.R. 224, H.R. 1823, H.R. 4446 Signed into Law - The White House, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/2026/01/congressional-bill-h-r-224-h-r-1823-h-r-4446-signed-into-law/
12. H.R.224 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): Disabled Veterans Housing Support Act, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/224
13. US HR224 - BillTrack50, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1768468/61250
14. Text - H.R.224 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): Disabled Veterans Housing Support Act, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/224/text/enr
15. Text - H.R.224 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): Disabled Veterans Housing Support Act, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/224/text
16. House of Representatives - Congressional Record, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/119/crec/2025/05/19/171/84/CREC-2025-05-19.pdf
17. All bills - live.house.gov, U.S. House of Representatives, accessed February 8, 2026, https://live.house.gov/?date=2025-05-20
18. Text - H.R.1823 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): VA Budget Shortfall Accountability Act, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1823/text/pl?overview=closed&format=txt
19. Text - H.R.1823 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): VA Budget Shortfall Accountability Act, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1823/text/enr
20. H.R. 1823, VA Budget Shortfall Accountability Act | Congressional Budget Office, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61385
21. H.R.4446 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): FAST VETS Act, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4446
22. Text - H.R.4446 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): FAST VETS Act | Congress.gov, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4446/text
23. H. Rept. 119-266 - FOCUSED ASSISTANCE AND SKILLS TRAINING FOR VETERANS' EMPLOYMENT AND TRANSITION SUCCESS ACT | Congress.gov, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/committee-report/119th-congress/house-report/266/1
24. All Info - H.R.4446 - 119th Congress (2025-2026): FAST VETS Act, accessed February 8, 2026, https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4446/all-info