Senate Barrels Toward Shutdown Amid Partisan Warfare Over Spending, While Reshaping Federal Courts with Key Conservative Appointments

Oct 24

Sub-headline: As a critical funding deadline looms, the Senate's focus on confirming lifetime judicial nominees reveals a stark contrast in political priorities, with long-term ideological goals taking precedence over immediate fiscal stability.

The United States Senate this week presented a study in contrasts, a legislative body operating on two distinct and conflicting tracks. One track was mired in a high-stakes partisan stalemate, with lawmakers unable to clear the procedural hurdles necessary to fund the federal government, pushing it inexorably closer to a shutdown. The other track moved with methodical and deliberate speed, successfully confirming a slate of conservative judicial nominees to lifetime appointments on the federal bench. This juxtaposition of paralysis and progress highlights a fundamental clash of political priorities on Capitol Hill, where the long-term project of shaping the nation's judiciary is proceeding apace, even as the government's basic ability to function hangs in the balance.

The stakes of this dual-track reality are immense, with consequences both immediate and generational. A government shutdown, which becomes more likely with each failed vote, would mean hundreds of thousands of federal workers being furloughed or forced to work without pay.1 It would disrupt a wide array of public services, from the processing of small business loans to the full operation of national parks, while creating a drag on the U.S. economy estimated at a reduction of 0.1 to 0.2 percentage points from GDP for each week it continues.3 Simultaneously, the judicial appointments confirmed and advanced this week will shape the American legal landscape for decades. These lifetime appointees will interpret the laws governing everything from reproductive rights and environmental regulations to labor protections and corporate accountability, creating a lasting legacy long after the current funding impasse is resolved.5

Deadlock on the Hill: The Anatomy of a Funding Standoff

The legislative narrative of the week was dominated by the Senate's repeated and unsuccessful attempts to advance H.R. 5371, the "Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2026." This bill is a stopgap funding measure, known as a Continuing Resolution or CR, designed to keep the government open after the fiscal year deadline of October 1, providing lawmakers more time to negotiate the 12 full-year appropriations bills that fund federal agencies.3

The Procedural Battlefield

The battle over the CR played out not in a debate over spending levels, but in a series of procedural votes that exposed the deep partisan divide. The key procedural motion was a vote on "cloture," a mechanism to end debate and proceed to a final vote on a bill. Under Senate rules, this requires a supermajority of 60 votes, giving the minority party significant power to block legislation it opposes.7

On Monday, the first attempt to invoke cloture on the motion to proceed to the CR failed by a vote of 50 yeas to 43 nays, falling well short of the 60-vote threshold.9 The effort was revived on Wednesday after Senator John Thune of South Dakota entered a motion to reconsider the vote. Yet, the outcome was the same. The second cloture vote also failed, this time 54 yeas to 46 nays, again demonstrating that the chamber was fundamentally deadlocked.9

The Policy Debate Behind the Impasse

This procedural gridlock was the direct result of a substantive policy disagreement. Republican leadership and the bill's supporters in the House framed H.R. 5371 as a "clean" CR, arguing it was a straightforward, temporary extension of current funding levels, free of controversial policy additions, and necessary to allow for an orderly appropriations process to continue.10

However, Democratic leaders rejected this characterization, blocking the bill because it omitted one of their top policy priorities: the extension of enhanced tax credits for health insurance plans under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). These subsidies, first implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, are set to expire, and without congressional action, millions of Americans face the prospect of double-digit premium hikes.12 In a joint statement, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries argued, "At a time when families are already being squeezed by higher costs, Republicans refuse to stop Americans from facing double-digit hikes in their health insurance premiums".12

The standoff reveals how an essential piece of governance—funding the government—has become a tool of political leverage. Democrats, using the power afforded to them by the Senate's 60-vote requirement for cloture, are effectively holding the CR hostage to force a negotiation on a separate, unrelated policy issue. Republicans, in turn, accuse Democrats of manufacturing a crisis by refusing to pass a "clean" bill and address the ACA subsidies later.12

The Human Cost: The Shutdown Fairness Act

The consequences of this high-level stalemate became painfully concrete on Thursday with the failure to advance S. 3012, the "Shutdown Fairness Act." The bill was designed to appropriate funds to pay "excepted" federal employees—those deemed essential for the protection of life and property who are required to work without pay during a shutdown—as well as active-duty members of the Armed Forces.16

Like the CR, this measure also failed to overcome a cloture vote, falling by a margin of 54 yeas to 45 nays.9 The opposition stemmed from concerns that the bill was inequitable. Critics, including federal employee unions, argued that the bill created a two-tiered system by paying only those forced to work while leaving hundreds of thousands of furloughed employees without a financial lifeline.17 They also contended that it gave the administration too much discretion to decide which employees were "excepted," potentially allowing political considerations to influence who gets paid.19 The failure of this bill means that as the shutdown looms, there is no legislative mechanism in place to mitigate the financial hardship for the very federal workers tasked with maintaining the nation's most critical functions.

Explainer: Decoding Congressional Jargon

To understand the week's events, it is essential to translate the specialized language of Capitol Hill.

Continuing Resolution (CR): Think of this as a temporary budget for the federal government. When Congress fails to pass its 12 annual spending bills by the October 1 deadline, it can pass a CR to keep funding agencies at existing levels for a short period—typically a few weeks or months—to avoid a shutdown and provide more time for negotiations.6
Appropriations Lapse (Shutdown): This is what happens when the fiscal year ends without either the annual spending bills or a CR being signed into law. Federal agencies lack the legal authority to spend money, forcing them to cease all functions deemed "non-essential." Employees in these roles are furloughed (sent home without pay), while "excepted" employees in critical roles like air traffic control and law enforcement must continue to work, also without pay, until funding is restored.1
Cloture: This is the formal term for a vote to end a debate in the Senate. Because Senate rules permit unlimited debate (the "filibuster"), a single senator can hold up legislation indefinitely. To overcome this, a supermajority of 60 senators must vote for cloture. This effectively means that most major, contested legislation needs 60 votes to pass, not a simple majority of 51, giving the minority party significant power to block the majority's agenda.7

A Lasting Legacy: The Judiciary Takes a Conservative Turn

In stark contrast to the legislative gridlock over funding, the Senate's process for considering and confirming federal judges moved with remarkable efficiency. While the chamber could not muster the 60 votes needed to keep the government open, it consistently found the simple majority required to confirm lifetime judicial appointments, underscoring a clear difference in political priorities.

The week saw a steady stream of confirmations. On Tuesday, the Senate confirmed Harold D. Mooty III to be a U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama by a bipartisan vote of 66-32, and Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe to the Middle District of Florida by a party-line vote of 53-46.9 On Wednesday, William W. Mercer was confirmed to the District of Montana, 52-45.9 And on Thursday, Stephen Chad Meredith was confirmed to the Eastern District of Kentucky by a narrow 48-45 vote.9 In the same period, the Senate also invoked cloture to advance the nominations of Bill Lewis for the Middle District of Alabama and Rebecca L. Taibleson for the powerful U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, setting them up for final confirmation votes.9

These are not merely new names on the federal bench; they represent the successful installation of jurists with deeply conservative records and legal philosophies. An examination of their backgrounds reveals a deliberate and strategic effort to shape the judiciary for a generation to come.

Case Study 1: Stephen Chad Meredith (Confirmed 48-45)

Stephen Chad Meredith, confirmed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, embodies the profile of a movement conservative. The son of a Republican state senator and a member of the influential Federalist Society, Meredith served as Kentucky's first Solicitor General.21 In that role, he became known for his aggressive defense of controversial state laws.

Most notably, Meredith defended a Kentucky law requiring physicians to perform a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound, display the image, and describe it to the patient. In court filings, he argued the law was justified because "there are a number of patients who don't understand the nature of the fetus within them," a position that critics condemned as condescending and a violation of patient autonomy.22 He also defended severe licensing regulations that threatened to close the last remaining abortion clinics in the state, arguing that the impact of their closure would be "essentially none" because patients could travel up to 150 miles to a clinic in a neighboring state.23 His record also includes defending the state's "right-to-work" law against challenges from labor unions and arguing in favor of stripping the governor of emergency powers during the COVID-19 pandemic.23 His confirmation places a judge with a well-documented history of hostility toward abortion access, workers' rights, and public health mandates on the federal bench for a lifetime term.

Case Study 2: William W. Mercer (Confirmed 52-45)

William "Bill" Mercer, confirmed to the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana, brings a long history in Republican politics and conservative legal circles to the judiciary. A former U.S. Attorney for Montana under President George W. Bush and a Republican member of the Montana House of Representatives, Mercer has a record that aligns with the party's most conservative platforms.25

As a prosecutor and legislator, he has advocated for harsh criminal justice policies and championed a bill requiring local law enforcement to cooperate with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.27 In private practice, he represented mining and oil and gas industries in challenging environmental regulations.27 In the state legislature, he voted for a package of bills that severely restricted abortion access and another that defined "sex" in state law as strictly binary, a measure aimed at curtailing transgender rights.27 His confirmation was opposed by civil rights groups who argued his record demonstrated a clear bias against environmental protection, immigrant rights, and reproductive freedom, raising serious concerns about his ability to serve as an impartial arbiter of the law.27

Case Study 3: Rebecca L. Taibleson (Cloture Invoked 50-45)

The advancement of Rebecca L. Taibleson's nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit represents a particularly significant victory for the conservative legal movement. A circuit court is one step below the Supreme Court, and its rulings set binding precedent for all federal district courts within its jurisdiction (in this case, Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin).

Taibleson's credentials are a veritable checklist of the conservative legal elite. She is a member of the Federalist Society and clerked for two of the movement's most revered figures: the late Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Brett Kavanaugh.30 She rose to prominence during Kavanaugh's contentious 2018 confirmation hearing, where she testified in his defense against allegations of sexual assault.31

Her legal record is equally revealing. As a lawyer in the Solicitor General's office during the Trump administration, she argued in a brief to the Supreme Court that President Trump's practice of blocking critics on his Twitter account did not violate the First Amendment.30 In another case, she argued on behalf of Dow Chemical that federal law should preempt state-level claims from residents harmed by radioactive waste, a position that would have shielded the corporation from a jury's multimillion-dollar award.30 She also argued to limit the scope of the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable seizure in cases where police shoot a fleeing suspect.30 Her advancement to a circuit court seat places a jurist with a clear originalist philosophy and a record of siding with government and corporate power in a position to shape American law for decades.

A Week of Clashing Priorities: Key Senate Votes

The following table starkly illustrates the Senate's dual-track week. While multiple procedural votes to advance government funding failed to secure the necessary 60 votes, a steady stream of judicial nominees were confirmed or advanced with simple majorities, revealing a clear partisan priority.

Date	Action/Nominee	Measure/Position	Vote Count (Yea-Nay)	Outcome
Oct. 20	Continuing Appropriations (H.R. 5371)	Motion to Invoke Cloture	50 - 43	Failed
Oct. 21	Harold D. Mooty III	Confirmation (District Judge, N.D. Ala.)	66 - 32	Confirmed
Oct. 21	Anne-Leigh Gaylord Moe	Confirmation (District Judge, M.D. Fla.)	53 - 46	Confirmed
Oct. 22	Continuing Appropriations (H.R. 5371)	Motion to Invoke Cloture (Reconsideration)	54 - 46	Failed
Oct. 22	William W. Mercer	Confirmation (District Judge, D. Mont.)	52 - 45	Confirmed
Oct. 22	Bill Lewis	Motion to Invoke Cloture (District Judge, M.D. Ala.)	60 - 39	Passed
Oct. 23	Shutdown Fairness Act (S. 3012)	Motion to Invoke Cloture	54 - 45	Failed
Oct. 23	Stephen Chad Meredith	Confirmation (District Judge, E.D. Ky.)	48 - 45	Confirmed
Oct. 23	Rebecca L. Taibleson	Motion to Invoke Cloture (Circuit Judge, 7th Cir.)	50 - 45	Passed

Behind the Votes: A Tale of Two Agendas

The Senate's actions this week were not a product of chaos but of a calculated political strategy. The intense focus on confirming judges, even at the expense of funding the government, reveals a clear choice by the majority party to prioritize its long-term ideological goals over short-term legislative stability. A government shutdown is a temporary crisis with immediate, but ultimately reversible, political and economic costs. A lifetime judicial appointment, however, is a permanent legacy. By installing dozens of young, conservative jurists onto the federal bench, the majority party is ensuring that its policy preferences and constitutional interpretations will be influential for a generation, regardless of which party controls Congress or the White House in the future.

This pattern—common backgrounds in the Federalist Society, clerkships with prominent conservative judges, and a history of litigation on key social and economic issues—is not coincidental. It is the result of a decades-long, highly organized effort to identify, cultivate, and elevate legal professionals who adhere to a specific judicial philosophy. The confirmations of Meredith, Mercer, and others are the culmination of that project.

Yet, even amid this intense domestic partisan warfare, there were glimmers of bipartisan cooperation. On Wednesday, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee held a business meeting and favorably reported a large number of bills and resolutions, many with broad bipartisan support.9 A significant portion of this legislation was aimed at countering the influence of the People's Republic of China and strengthening U.S. support for Taiwan, including measures to deter aggression, combat Chinese arms sales, and support Taiwan's allies.9 This flurry of activity suggests that while domestic policy is a political minefield, a working consensus still exists on certain critical national security and foreign policy challenges.

The Week Ahead: No Resolution in Sight

As the Senate concluded its work for the week, the path forward remained deeply uncertain. The "Congressional Program Ahead" sections of the daily digests show that the judicial confirmation process will continue unabated, with final confirmation votes for Rebecca Taibleson and Bill Lewis scheduled for Monday, October 27.9

However, there is no clear resolution for the funding crisis. While motions to reconsider the failed cloture votes on the Continuing Resolution remain on the calendar, there is no indication that the underlying political dynamics have changed.9 The Senate is departing Washington for the weekend with the federal government on a collision course with a shutdown, setting the stage for another week of high-stakes brinkmanship with the financial security of millions of Americans and the stability of the U.S. economy hanging in the balance.

Works cited

Government Shutdowns: Causes and Effects - Brookings Institution, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/what-is-a-government-shutdown-and-why-are-we-likely-to-have-another-one/
Shutdown impact: What it means for workers, federal programs and the economy, accessed October 24, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/shutdown-trump-furloughs-firings-economy-federal-workers-efced4c32282087c8c53aeab535230a0
Government Shutdowns Q&A: Everything You Should Know, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.crfb.org/papers/government-shutdowns-qa-everything-you-should-know
US government shutdown: Trump admin's closure hits workers, economy; Which sectors are affected?, accessed October 24, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/international-business/us-government-shutdown-trump-admins-closure-hits-workers-economy-which-sectors-are-affected/articleshow/124681495.cms
How Did The Courts Become So Politicized? | Insights - Library of Congress Blogs, accessed October 24, 2025, https://blogs.loc.gov/kluge/2021/09/how-did-the-courts-become-so-politicized/
Government Shutdown Advisory: Summary of Possible Lapse in Appropriations | Insights, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/09/government-shutdown-advisory
Parliamentary Procedure: A Legislator's Guide - National Conference of State Legislatures, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.ncsl.org/about-state-legislatures/parliamentary-procedure-a-legislators-guide
Introduction to the Legislative Process in the U.S. Congress, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R42843
CREC-2025-10-22-dailydigest.pdf
House Passes H.R. 5371, The Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2026, accessed October 24, 2025, https://appropriations.house.gov/news/press-releases/house-passes-hr-5371-continuing-appropriations-and-extensions-act-2026
WHAT THEY ARE SAYING: America Needs the House-Led Clean CR, accessed October 24, 2025, https://rsc-pfluger.house.gov/media/press-releases/what-they-are-saying-america-needs-house-led-clean-cr
Democrats stake out opposition to spending bill, raising threat of a shutdown | PBS News, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/democrats-stake-out-opposition-to-spending-bill-raising-threat-of-a-shutdown
Congress Votes on Two Continuing Resolutions, But Still Have No Agreement to Avoid Shutdown on October 1—Take Action!, accessed October 24, 2025, https://nlihc.org/resource/congress-votes-two-continuing-resolutions-still-have-no-agreement-avoid-shutdown-october-1
Democrats Face Their 'But He Fights!' Moment in Shutdown Battle - Sabato's Crystal Ball, accessed October 24, 2025, https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/democrats-face-their-but-he-fights-moment-in-shutdown-battle/
Update on Government Shutdown and Guidance - Mario Diaz-Balart - House.gov, accessed October 24, 2025, https://mariodiazbalart.house.gov/services/update-government-shutdown-and-guidance
US SB3012 | 2025-2026 | 119th Congress - LegiScan, accessed October 24, 2025, https://legiscan.com/US/bill/SB3012/2025
Competing Bills to Pay Feds on Time Fail in Senate - National Treasury Employees Union, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.nteu.org/blog/2025/10/23/Competing%20Bills
S. 3012 (PCS) - Shutdown Fairness Act - Content Details - - GovInfo, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-119s3012pcs
Letter Supporting Legislation That Would Guarantee Backpay, Current and Continued Pay for Federal Workers In The Face of the Government Shutdown | AFL-CIO, accessed October 24, 2025, https://aflcio.org/about/advocacy/legislative-alerts/letter-supporting-legislation-would-guarantee-backpay-current-and
Government Shutdown Update: Day 23, October 23 | DLA Piper, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.dlapiper.com/en-us/insights/publications/2025/10/government-shutdown-update-day-23-october-23
Chad Meredith - Wikipedia, accessed October 24, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chad_Meredith
Anti-Abortion Attorney Chad Meredith's Nomination for a Lifetime Position in Our Federal Judiciary Has Risen From the Dead - National Women's Law Center, accessed October 24, 2025, https://nwlc.org/anti-abortion-attorney-chad-merediths-nomination-for-a-lifetime-position-in-our-federal-judiciary-has-risen-from-the-dead/
Chad Meredith | CourtsMatter, accessed October 24, 2025, https://courtsmatter.org/nominees/chad-meredith/
No. 19-417 In the Supreme Court of the United States EMW WOMEN'S SURGICAL CENTER, PSC, ON BEHALF, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-417/120398/20191028102823893_19-417%20Brief%20in%20Opposition.pdf
William W. Mercer - Wikipedia, accessed October 24, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_W._Mercer
Holland & Hart Partner William Mercer Confirmed as Federal Judge for District of Montana, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.hollandhart.com/holland-hart-partner-william-mercer-confirmed-as-federal-judge-for-district-of-montana?rel=0&wmode=transparent&autoplay=1
William "Bill" Mercer Fact Sheet, accessed October 24, 2025, https://afj.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/William-Bill-Mercer-Fact-Sheet.pdf
William Walter "Bill" Mercer - Alliance for Justice, accessed October 24, 2025, https://afj.org/nominee/william-walter-bill-mercer/
Trump Nominated William Mercer, An Attorney With A History Of Politicizing The Department Of Justice And Pushing For Far-Right Legislation - Accountable US, accessed October 24, 2025, https://accountable.us/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/William-Mercer-Backgrounder.pdf
Rebecca Taibleson Fact Sheet, accessed October 24, 2025, https://afj.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Rebecca-Taibleson-Fact-Sheet.pdf
Trump Judicial Nominee Catches Heat From Conservative Legal Group - NOTUS, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.notus.org/courts/trump-judicial-nominee-rebecca-taibleson-conservative-legal-group-first-liberty-institute
Rebecca Taibleson Knew Exactly What Her Far-Right Critics Needed to Hear | Balls and Strikes, accessed October 24, 2025, https://ballsandstrikes.org/nominations/rebecca-taibleson-obergefell-hearing/
Rebecca Taibleson Letter of Opposition - Alliance for Justice, accessed October 24, 2025, https://afj.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Rebecca-Taibleson-Letter-of-Opposition.pdf
Section 5. Creating Formal Public Reporting Processes - Community Tool Box, accessed October 24, 2025, https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/maintain/maintain-quality-performance/creating-formal-public-reporting-processes/main
The Legislative Process | house.gov, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.house.gov/the-house-explained/the-legislative-process
Trump judicial nominee Rebecca Taibleson faces Senate confirmation - Fox News, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/mike-davis-trumps-latest-pick-reform-federal-judiciary-another-home-run
HR 5371 — Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2026 | The White House, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/H.R.-5371-%E2%80%94-Continuing-Appropriations-and-Extensions-Act-2026.pdf
H.R. 5371 - Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2026 - House Rules Committee, accessed October 24, 2025, https://rules.house.gov/bill/119/CR26
TAIBLESON Letter of Support - Kirkland & Ellis - Senate Judiciary Committee, accessed October 24, 2025, https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/taibleson_letter_of_support_-_kirkland__ellis.pdf

Victor Acorda